HEURISTIK DAN BIAS JUDGMENT DALAM RISET AKUNTANSI

AICPA. 1988. Statements on Auditing Standards No. 59: Th e Auditors’ Consideration of

An Entity’s Ability to Continue as A Going Concern. New York: American Institute of Certifi ed Public Accountants.

Anderson, J. C., M. M. Jennings, D. J. Lowe, & P. M. J. Reckers. 1997. Th e mitigation of hindsight bias in judges’ evaluation of auditor decision. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Th eory, 16(2):20-39.

Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A., & Lin, J. W. 2000. Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance, LV(1) (February): 81-106.

Ang, J. S., & Cox, D. R. 1997. Controlling the agency cost of insider trading. Journal of Financial And Strategic Decisions, 10(1) (Spring):15-26.

Aronson, E. 1969. Th e theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology, 4:1-34. Orlando, FIL Academic Press.

Aronson, E. 2004. Reducing hostility and building compassion: Lessons from the jigsaw classroom. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), Th e social psychology of good and evil (pp. 469–488). The Guilford Press.

Asare, S. K. 1992. Th e auditor’s going concern decision: interaction of task variables and the sequential processing of evidence. Th e Accounting Review, 67(2) (April): 379-393.

Ashton, A. H., & R. H. Ashton. 1990. Evidence responsiveness in professional judgment: eff ects of positive and negative evidence and presentation mode. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 46: 1-19.

Arkes, H. R., D. Faust, T. J. Guilmette, & K. Hart. 1988. Eliminating the hindsight bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2):305-307.

Awasthi, V. & Pratt, J. 1990. Th e eff ects of monetary incentives on eff ort and decision performance: the role of cognitive characteristics. Th e Axcounting Review, 65(Iss. 4):797 (Oct. 1990).

Bar-Hillel, M. 1982. Studies of Representativeness. Dalam D. Kahneman, P. Slovic dan Tversky: Judgments Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3 – 20.

Bazerman, M. H. 1994. Judgment in managerial decision making. Th ird Edition, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Berger, P. G., & Hann, R. N. 2007. Segment profi tability and proprietary and agency costs of disclosure. Th e Accounting Review, 82(4):869-906.

Blank, H., J. Musch, & R. F. Pohl. 2007. Hinsight bias: on being wise after event. Social Cognition, 25(1):1 - 9.

Brown, C. E., & I. Solomon. 1987. Eff ects of outcome information on evaluations of managerial decisions. Th e Accounting Review, 62(3):564-577.

Brown, C. E., & I. Solomon. 1993. An experimental investigation of explanation for outcome eff ects on appraisals of capital budgeting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10(1): 84-117.

Bazerman, M. H. 1994. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. Th ird Edition, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Brody, Richard G. dan Steven E. Kaplan. 1996. Escalation of commitment among internal auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Th eory, 15(1):1–15

Campbell, J. D., & A. Tesser. 1983. Motivational interpretations of hindsight bias: an individual diff erence analysis. Journal of Personality, 5: 605-620.

Casper, J. D., K. Benedict, & J. L. Perry. 1989. Juror decision making, attitudes, and the hindsight bias. Law and Human Behavior, 13(3): 291-310.

Christensen-Szalanski, J. J., & C. F. Willham. 1991. Th e hindsight bias: a meta analyses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40: 50-58.

Creyer, C., & W. T. Ross Jr. 1993. Hindsight bias and inferences in choice: the mediating eff ect of cognitive eff ort. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55: 61-77.

Chang, C. J., Sin-Hui, Y., & Rong-Ruey, D. 2002. An empirical examination of competing theories to explain the framing eff ect in accounting-related decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14: 35-64.

Cheng, M. M., Schulz, A. K.-D., Luckett, P. F., & Booth, P. 2003. Th e eff ects of hurdle rates on the level of escalation of commitment in capital budgeting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15:63-86.

Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., & Verdi, R. S. 2006. Agency problems of excess endowment holdings in not-for-profi t fi rms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41:307-333.

Crutchley, C. E., & Hansen, R. S. 1989. A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividend. Financial Management, Winter: 36-45.

Davies, M. F. 1987. Reduction of hindsight bias by restoration of foresight perspective: effectiveness of foresight-encoding and hindsight retrieval strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40:50-68.

Easterbrook, F. 1984. Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review (September): 650–650.

Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: an assesment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74.

Ekanayake, S. 2004. Agency theory, national culture and management control systems.

Journal of American Academy of Business, 4(1/2) (March): 49- 4. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1)(1989):57-74.

Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency Problems and the theory of the fi rm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2)(April):288-307.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (June): 301-325.

Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Fischhoff , B. 1975. Hindsight # Foresight: Th e Eff ect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1: 288-299.

Fischhoff , B. 1982a. Debiasing. Dalam D. Kahneman, P. Slovic dan Tversky: Judgments Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press. pp. 422-444.

Fischhoff , B. 1982b. For those Condemned to Study the Past: Heuristics and Biases in

Hindsight. Dalam D. Kahneman, P. Slovic dan Tversky: Judgments Under Uncertainty:

Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. pp. 335-354.

Fischhoff , B. 2007. An early history of hindsight research. Social Cognition, 25(1):10-13.

Fisher, J. G., & T. I. Selling. 1993. Th e outcome eff ect in performance evaluation: decision process observability and consensus. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5: 58-77.

Ghosh, D. 1997. De-escalation strategies: some experimental evidence. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 9: pp. 88-112.

Guilbault, R. L., F. B. Bryant, J. H. Brockway, & E. J. Posavac. 2004. A meta-analysis of research on hindsight bias. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26(2&3): 103-117.

Harley, E. M. 2007. Hindsight bias in legal decision making. Social Cognition, 25(1):48-63.

Hartono, J. 2004. How, Why, and When: Investors Revise their Beliefs to Company Information. Yogyakarta: Andi Ofset.

Hastie, R., D. A. Schkade, & J. W. Payne. 1999. Juror judgments in civil cases: hindsight effects on judgments of liability for punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior, 23(5): 597-614.

Hawkins, S. A., & R. Hastie. 1990. Hindsight: Biased Judgments of Past Events After the Outcomes are Known. Psychological Bulletin, 107(3): 311-327.

Heiman, V. B. 1990. Auditors Assessments of Th e Likelihood of Error Explanations in Analytical Review. Th e Accounting Review, 65: 875-890.

Hogarth, R. M. 1987. Judgment and Choice. 2nd Edition, Singapore: John Willey & Sons.

Hodgkinson, G.P, N.J. Bwon, & A.J. Maule, 1999, Breaking the Frame: An Analysis of Strategic Cognition and Decision Making under Uncertainty, Strategic Management Journal, 20(10) (Oct., 1999):977-985

IAI_KAP. 2001a. Aturan Etika Kompartemen Akuntan Publik. Standard Profesional kuntan Publik, Per 1 Januari 2001, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

IAI_KAP. 2001b. Pernyataan Standar Auditing No. 04, Seksi 230: Penggunaan KemahiranProfesional dengan Cermat dan Seksama dalam Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Auditor. tandard Profesional Akuntan Publik, Per 1 Januari 2001, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

IAI_KAP. 2001c. Pernyataan Standar Auditing No. 07, Seksi 326: Bukti Audit. Standard rofesional Akuntan Publik, Per 1 Januari 2001, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

IAI_KAP. 2001d. Pernyataan Standar Auditing No. 30, Seksi 341: Pertimbangan Auditor atas Kemampuan Entitas dalam Mempertahankan Kelangsungan Hidupnya. Standard Profesional Akuntan Publik, Per 1 Januari 2001, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2):323-329.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3:82-136.

Kahneman, D., & A. Tversky. 1973. On Th e Psychology of Prediction. Dalam D. Kahneman, P. Slovic dan Tversky: Judgments Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge, U.K.: 48-68.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47:263-291.

Kahneman, D., & A. Tversky. 1982. Th e Simulation Heuristic. Dalam D. Kahneman, P. Slovic dan Tversky: Judgments Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 201-208.

Kamin, K. A., & J. J. Rachlinski. 1995. Ex Post # Ex-ante: Determining Liability in Hindsight. Law and Human Behavior, 19(1):89-104.

Kennedy, J. 1995. Debiasing the curse of knowledge in audit judgment. The Accounting Review, 70(2):249-273.

Koonce, L. 1992. Explanation and counterexplanation during audit analytical review. Th e Accounting Review, 67(2):386-406.

Keil, M., Mann, J., & Rai, A. 2000. Why software project escalate: an empirical analysis and test of four theoritical models. MIS Quarterly, 24(4) (December): 631-664.