Konsep Dasar Sains Informasi
Keywords:
sains informasiSynopsis
Dalam kehidupan sehari-hari, kita sering mengucap kata informasi. Kitapun mengakui sering kali merasa membutuhkan informasi. Disadari atau tidak, kita sebenarnya sedang hidup di era informasi. Aktivitas kita juga selalu berkutat dengan informasi. Mulai dari bangun tidur hingga tidur lagi sesungguhnya kita selalu melakukan aktivitas informasi. Kenyataan ini yang menjadi sumber inspirasi kami untuk menulis buku “Konsep Dasar Sains Informasi”. Harapannya agar kita bersama-sama dapat mempelajari inti dari informasi dan tentu saja, bagaimana ilmunya.
Jika dilihat dari kata pembentuk frase, secara sederhana informasi sains dapat dimaknai sebagai ilmu informasi. Jika kita enggan berpikir sejenak, keberadaan informasi sesungguhnya yang ada di sekitar kita. Informasi ada dimana-mana. Apa yang kita lihat di seluruh alam semesta ini, apa yang dapat kita sentuh, bahkan apa yang bisa kita rasakan adalah informasi. Untuk hal ini, lebih jauh di buku ini diulas tentang pemaknaan informasi dari sisi filsafat.
Lalu apa manfaat dari mempelajari ilmunya, ilmu apa saja yang berhubungan dengan informasi, dan bagaimana cara meneliti ilmunya?. Pada buku ini tercantum pula teori dan konsep untuk menganalisis informasi, seperti information-as-knowledge, information-as-process, dan information-as-thing dari Buckland (1991), Types of Information milik Bates (2006, 2015, 2018, 2022), serta disiplin informasi dari Bates (2007).
Buku ini bermanfaat bagi siapa saja yang ingin mengetahui beragam informasi, bagaimana cara mempelajarinya, serta apa perkembangannya. Pada buku ini juga dijelaskan bagaimana perilaku masyarakat dalam aktivitas informasi, termasuk etika pemanfaatan informasi dan sanksi yang akan kita terima jika melanggar. Kompleksitas kajiannya mencakup jenis institusi pengelola informasi, nama-nama profesi informasi, serta apa saja kewajiban mereka.
Tidak lupa juga dicontohkan tema penelitian, informasi kuatitatif, istilah ilmu pengukuran informasi, dan apa saja aplikasi dan software yang berguna informasi sebagai tools.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abramo, G., 2018. Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), pp.590–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.05.001.
Ajiferuke, I. and Famoye, F., 2015. Modelling count response variables in informetric studies: Comparison among count, linear, and lognormal regression models. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), pp.499–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.001.
Aman, V., 2018. A new bibliometric approach to measure knowledge transfer of internationally mobile scientists. Scientometrics, 117(1), pp.227–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2864-x.
Balina, S., 2014. Public libraries – facilitators of information society and e- inclusion in Latvia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, [online] 109, pp.412–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.482.
Bates, M., 2015. The information professions: knowledge , memory , heritage. Information Research, [online] 2(1), p.13. Available at: <http://informationr.net/ir/20-1/paper655.html#.YYXTwZ5Bw2w>.
Bates, M., 2022. A proto-paradigm for information science research. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science. University of Borås. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47989/colis2201.
Bates, M.J., 2006. Fundamental forms of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), pp.1033–1045. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20369.
Bates, M.J., 2007. Defining the information disciplines in encyclopedia development. Information Research, [online] 12(4). Available at: <https://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis29.html>.
Bates, M.J., 2010. An operational definition of the information disciplines. Available at: <https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/pdf/Contribution512-1.pdf>.
Bates, M.J., 2018. Concepts for the Study of Information Embodiment. 66.
Bawden, D. and Robinson, L., 2022. Introduction to Information Science. London: Facet Publishing.
de Beer, C.S., 2015. Information science as an interscience. Waltham: Chandos Publishing.
De Bellis, N., 2009. Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press.
Björneborn, L. and Ingwersen, P., 2004. Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), pp.1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077.
Bornmann, L., 2014. Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), pp.895–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005.
Buckland, M.K., 1991. Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, [online] 42(5). Available at: <https://skat.ihmc.us/rid=1KR7VC4CQ-SLX5RG-5T39/BUCKLAND(1991)-informationasthing.pdf>.
Case, D.O., 2002. Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. [online] California: Academy Press. Available at: <https://libproxy.library.unt.edu:9443/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=9683476&site=ehost-live&scope=site>.
Chellappandi, P. and Vijayakumar, C.S., 2018. Informetrics and altmetrics - an emerging field in library and information science research. 7(1), pp.5–8. https://doi.org/http/doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.2529398 http.
Choo, C.W., 2013. Information culture and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Information Management, [online] 33(5), pp.775–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.05.009.
Claussen, J.E., Cooney, P.B., Defilippi, J.M., Fox, S.G., Glaser, S.M., Hawkes, E., Hutt, C., Jones, M.H., Kemp, I.M., Lerner, A., Midway, S.R., Nesbit, S., Osborne-Gowey, J., Roberts, R. and Steward, C., 2013. Science communication in a digital age: Social media and the American Fisheries Society. Fisheries, 38(8), pp.359–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2013.816289.
Cybermetrics Corporation, 2025. Cybermetrics privacy policy. Cybermetrics Corporation. Available at: <https://cybermetrics.com/,>.
Duff, A.S., 2015. Information society. Second Edi ed. [online] International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.95017-7.
Dutta, B., 2020. Scientometrics and altmetrics: Trends and issues. Vidyasagar University.
Floridi, L., 2011. The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L., 2013. The ethics of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grover, R.J., Greer, R.C. and Agada, J., 2010. Assessing information needs: managing transformative library services. California: Library Unlimited.
Hashim, L. and Mokhtar, W.N.H., 2012. Preparing new era librarians and information professionals: trends and issues. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, [online] 2(7), pp.151–156. Available at: <https://ijhss.thebrpi.org/journals/Vol_2_No_7_April_2012/16.pdf>.
Herold, K., 2024. Introduction: Design in the philosophy of information. Project Muse, [online] 73(1), pp.1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2024.a952289.
Hood, W.W. and Wilson, C.S., 2001. The literature of bibliometrics , scientometrics , and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(October 2001), pp.291–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342.
Indonesia, 2008a. Undang-undang republik Indonesia nomor 11 tahun 2008 tentang infromasi dan transaksi elektronik.
Indonesia, 2008b. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 14 tahun 2008 tentang keterbukaan informasi publik dan peraturan pemerintah Republik Indonesia nomor 61 tahun 2010 tentang pelaksanaan undang-undang nomor 14 tahun 2008 tentang keterbukaan informasi publik.
Indonesia, 2016. Undang-undang nomor 19 tahun 2016 tentang perubahan atas undang-undang nomor 11 tahun 2008 tentang informasi dan transaksi elektronik.
Indonesia, 2024. Undang-undang republik Indonesia nomor 1 tahun 2024 tentang perubahan kedua atas undang-undang nomor 11 tahun 2008 tentang informasi dan transaksi elektronik.
Ismail, S., Nason, E., Marjanovic, S. and Grant, J., 2009. Bibliometrics as a tool for supporting prospective R&D decision-making in the health sciences: Strengths, weaknesses and options for future development. [online] Rand Europe. Available at: .
Jetha, K., Berente, N. and King, J.L., 2017. Digital and analog logics: An analysis of the discourse on property rights and information goods. The Information Society, [online] 33(3), pp.119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1294125.
Liddy, E.D., 2014. iSchools & the iSchool at Syracuse University. In: Library and Information Sciences. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54812-3_4.
Mingers, J. and Leydesdorff, L., 2015. A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 246(1), pp.1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002.
Moed, H.F., 2017. Applied evaluative informetrics. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60522-7.
Morales, A., 2016. Cibermetrics: Measuring the web. Comunicación y Medios, 25(34), pp.118–119. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-1529.2016.44765.
Omekwu, C.O., 2021. Internet and information search. [online] Abuja: National Open University of Nigeria. Available at: <https://nou.edu.ng/coursewarecontent/LIS>.
O’Neill, B., 2012. Trust in the information society. Computer Law & Security Review, [online] 28(5), pp.551–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2012.07.005.
Pieters, W., 2017. Beyond individual-centric privacy: Information technology in social systems. The Information Society, [online] 33(5), pp.271–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1354108.
Qiu, J., Zhao, R., Yang, S. and Dong, K., 2017. Informetrics. Springer Nature Singapore.
Ranganathan, 2024. Infometrics and Scientometrics. Available at: <https://oms.bdu.ac.in/ec/content-bucket/38-15-438-63-20241202_052816.pdf>.
Roemer, R.C. and Borchardt, R., 2015. Meaningful metrics: A 21st century Librarian’s guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics, and research impact. Chicago: Association of College & Research Libraries.
Rubin, R.E. and Rubin, R.G., 2020. Foundations of library and information science. Chicago: American Library Association.
Salinas-Ríos, K. and Janneire García-López, A., 2022. Bibliometrics, a useful tool within the field of research Bibliometría, una herramienta útil dentro del campo de la investigación. Journal of Basic and Applied Psychology Research Biannual Publication, [online] 3(6), pp.9–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29057/jbapr.v3i6.6829.
Savolainen, R., 2017. Information sharing and knowledge sharing as communicative activities. Information Research, [online] 22(3), pp.17–19. Available at: <https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1156371.pdf>.
Schlichter, B.R. and Danylchenko, L., 2014. Measuring ICT usage quality for information society building. Government Information Quarterly, [online] 31(1), pp.170–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.003.
Smith, M., Mcculloch, T. and Daly, M., 2025. Being, knowing and doing: aligning ontology, epistemology, and axiology to develop an account of social work as practice and axiology to develop an account of social work as practice. Social Work Education, [online] 44(3), pp.522–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2024.2330598.
Smith, N., 2022. Introduction to philosophy. Iowa: Kendal Hunt Publishing.
Stuart, D., 2023. Praise for web metrics for library and information professionals. 2nd ed. London: Facet Publishing.
Thelwall, M., 2016. Data science altmetrics. Journal of Data and Information Science, 1(2), pp.7–12. https://doi.org/10.20309/jdis.201610.
UNESCO, 2011. Intergovernmental council for the information for all programs. [online] Paris. Available at: <https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000191487>.
Yang, S., Yuan, Q. and Dong, J., 2020. Are scientometrics , informetrics , and bibliometrics different ? Data Science and Infometrics, 1, pp.50–72. https://doi.org/10.4236/dsi.2020.11003.
Zelazny, R., 2022. Information goods-towards identification and classification. Wydziału Zarządzania GWSH, 19, pp.77–90. https://doi.org/10.53259/2022.19.08.
Downloads
BISAC
- COM032000 Computers / Information Technology
Published
January 27, 2026
Series
Categories
Copyright (c) 2026 Airlangga University Press
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
